SynthesisPediatric surgery international2025
Robotic surgery in anorectal malformations: Where are we? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative study of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectovestibular fistula.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotics in Pediatric Surgery: Expanding Indications and Techniques.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Indirect evidence for the volume-outcome relationship for corrective surgery for anorectal malformations using the IQWIG V24-07 rapid report methodology.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Comment on "Robotic surgery in anorectal malformations: where are we? A systematic review".Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery has emerged as a promising technique in pediatric colorectal surgery, offering enhanced precision, superior ergonomics, and potentially improved outcomes compared to conventional laparoscopic and open approaches. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current literature on robotic-assisted surgery for anorectal malformations (ARMs) in pediatric patients. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published between 2000 and 2025, focusing on robotic procedures in infants with ARMs. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on a total of 39 patients (male-to-female ratio 15:0.5), with a median age at surgery of 6.9 months. The most frequent ARM types were recto-prostatic, recto-bulbar, and recto-vesical fistulas. Median operative time was 226.3 min, and median length of hospital stay was 5.5 days. No intraoperative or early postoperative complications were observed, while late complications occurred in 18% of cases. Only one study included a comparative analysis with laparoscopic-assisted PSARP, precluding meta-analysis. Robotic-assisted anorectoplasty appears to be a safe and feasible approach, particularly advantageous for nerve-sparing pelvic dissection. However, further high-quality studies are necessary to define indications, evaluate long-term functional outcomes, and compare this technique with conventional surgical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40548987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.