Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548971›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome].

Malvina Garner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Malvina GarnerKlinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg Saar, Deutschland. malvina.garner@uks.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodological issueSemicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) is a rare but clinically significant cause of vertigo and auditory symptoms. The clinical presentation is relatively specific and typically includes sound- or pressure-induced rotational vertigo accompanied by nystagmus, autophony, hypersensitivity to bone-conducted sound (hyperacusis), and pseudo-conductive hearing loss. Imaging plays a central role in establishing an accurate diagnosis and in excluding differential diagnoses. High-resolution thin-slice computed tomography (CT), particularly when combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), forms the cornerstone of radiologic assessment. Importantly, a substantial proportion of patients with radiologically confirmed dehiscence remain asymptomatic. While the presence of vestibular symptoms in conjunction with a bony dehiscence should raise suspicion for SCD syndrome, other etiologies must be prioritized in the differential diagnosis based on clinical history, examination, and imaging findings, given the rarity of the condition.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSemicircular Canal DehiscenceSemicircular CanalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedVertigoDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansSyndromeAcute vestibular failureDizzinessOpen third windowSuperior semicircular canal dehiscenceTinnitusTullio’s phenomenon

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.