Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548696›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Cognitive control of behavior and hippocampal information processing without medial prefrontal cortex.

Eun Hye Park, Kally C O'Reilly Sparks, Griffin Grubbs, David Taborga, Kyndall Nicholas, Armaan S Ahmed, Natalie Ruiz-Péreza, Natalie Kim, Simon Segura-Carrillo, André A Fenton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eun Hye ParkCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9180-7579
Kally C O'Reilly SparksCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
Griffin GrubbsCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
David TaborgaCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
Kyndall NicholasCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
Armaan S AhmedCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
Natalie Ruiz-PérezaCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
Natalie KimCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
Simon Segura-CarrilloCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-5158
André A FentonCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-1156

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of memory maintenance and dysfunction in neural circuitsR01MH115304 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI FENTON, ANDRE ANTONIO, SACKTOR, TODD C · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Towards a critical test of the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesisR01MH132204 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ANDRE ANTONIO FENTON · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Neural coordination and discoordination in Fmr1 null miceR01NS105472 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI FENTON, ANDRE ANTONIO · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01MH115304NIMH NIH HHS R01MH132204NINDS NIH HHS R01NS105472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control tasks require using one class of information while ignoring competing classes of information. The central role of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in cognitive control is well established in the primate literature and largely accepted in the rodent literature because mPFC damage causes deficits in tasks that may require cognitive control, as inferred, typically from the task design. In prior work, we used an active place avoidance task where a rat or mouse on a rotating arena is required to avoid the stationary task-relevant locations of a mild shock and ignore the rotating task-irrelevant locations of those shocks. The task is impaired by hippocampal manipulations, and the discharge of hippocampal place cell populations judiciously alternates between representing stationary locations near the shock zone and rotating locations far from the shock zone, demonstrating cognitive control concurrently in behavior and the hippocampal representation of spatial information. Here, we test whether rat mPFC lesion impairs the active place avoidance task to evaluate two competing hypotheses, a 'central-computation' hypothesis that the mPFC is essential for the computations required for cognitive control and an alternative 'local-computation' hypothesis that other brain areas can perform the computations required for cognitive control, independent of mPFC. Ibotenic acid lesion of the mPFC was effective, damaging the cingulate, prelimbic, and infralimbic cortices. The lesion also altered the normal coordination of metabolic activity across remaining structures. The lesion did not impair learning to avoid the initial location of shock or long-term place avoidance memory, but impaired avoidance after the shock was relocated. The lesion also did not impair the alternation between task-relevant and task-irrelevant hippocampal representations of place information. These findings support the local-computation hypothesis that computations required for cognitive control can occur locally in brain networks independently of the mPFC.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCognitionHippocampusPrefrontal CortexAnimalsAvoidance LearningIbotenic AcidMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansIbotenic Aciddecisionexecutive controlhippocampuslearningmemoryneural coordinationneurosciencerat

Identifiers

PMID40548696
PMCPMC12185103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.