Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548674›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health

Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Which Aspects Do Men Value Most? An Interview Study With Men Invited to a Population-Based Program.

Linda Svensson, Ola Bratt, Jonas Hugosson, Karin Stinesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda SvenssonDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8661-8095
Ola BrattDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9198-9445
Jonas HugossonDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karin StinesenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores aspects that men consider when deciding whether to participate in a prostate cancer screening program and how the information in the invitation letter contributed to their decision. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50- to 62-year-old men invited by letter to a population-based prostate cancer screening program. Data from transcribed interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis using manifest and indicative approaches. Eighteen men were interviewed, 10 whom chose to be tested, and 8 who declined screening. The information in the invitation letter was not decisive for whether men chose to be tested or not. The aspects that the men valued in their personal decision to participate or refrain from screening were categorized as (a) the expectation that authorities should take responsibility and provide guidance; (b) fear, which was described as both a driving force and a barrier; (c) reliance upon intuition combined with seeking social and emotional support; (d) the perception of one's own risk of being affected. Men who relied on risk assessment mentioned difficulties in evaluating the information about the potential disadvantages of screening. Our findings suggest that the intention of informed decision-making for prostate cancer screening is difficult to fully realize. Further research is needed to understand how the individual decision-making process is influenced by factors such as assessment of personal risk, perception of advantages and disadvantages, and cultural background, and to optimize the information to the invited men.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningProstatic NeoplasmsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk Assessmentdecision-aidhealth screeningprostate cancerprostate-specific antigenPSA testing

Identifiers

PMID40548674
PMCPMC12185938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.