ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Graph-RPI: predicting RNA-protein interactions via graph autoencoder and self-supervised learning strategies.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DeepKbhb: Context-Aware Prediction of Human Lysine β-Hydroxybutyrylation Sites.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- A multimodal human protein embeddings database: DeepDrug Protein Embeddings Bank (DPEB).NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA-protein interactions (RPIs) are essential for many biological functions and are associated with various diseases. Traditional methods for detecting RPIs are labor-intensive and costly, necessitating efficient computational methods. In this study, we proposed a novel sequence-based RPI prediction framework based on graph neural networks (GNNs) that addressed key limitations of existing methods, such as inadequate feature integration and negative sample construction. Our method represented RNAs and proteins as nodes in a unified interaction graph, enhancing the representation of RPI pairs through multi-feature fusion and employing self-supervised learning strategies for model training. The model's performance was validated through five-fold cross-validation, achieving accuracy of 0.880, 0.811, 0.950, 0.979, 0.910, and 0.924 on the RPI488, RPI369, RPI2241, RPI1807, RPI1446, and RPImerged datasets, respectively. Additionally, in cross-species generalization tests, our method outperformed existing methods, achieving an overall accuracy of 0.989 across 10 093 RPI pairs. Compared with other state-of-the-art RPI prediction methods, our approach demonstrates greater robustness and stability in RPI prediction, highlighting its potential for broad biological applications and large-scale RPI analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.