ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
IECata: interpretable bilinear attention network and evidential deep learning improve the catalytic efficiency prediction of enzymes.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How far can you go? Extrapolating values of catalytic activity from known protein landscapes in natural and directed evolution.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- UniKineG: Unified-Coordinate Geometric Graphs Enable Robust Enzyme Kinetic Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enzyme catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) is a key parameter for identifying high-activity enzymes. Recently, deep learning techniques have demonstrated the potential for fast and accurate kcat/Km prediction. However, three challenges remain: (i) the limited size of the available kcat/Km dataset hinders the development of deep learning models; (ii) the model predictions lack reliable confidence estimates; and (iii) models lack interpretable insights into enzyme-catalyzed reactions. To address these challenges, we proposed IECata, a kcat/Km prediction model that provides uncertainty estimation and interpretability. IECata collected a dataset of 11 815 kcat/Km entries from the BRENDA and SABIO-RK databases, along with an out-of-domain test dataset of 806 entries from the literature. By introducing evidential deep learning, IECata provides uncertainty estimates for kcat/Km predictions. Moreover, it uses a bilinear attention mechanism to focus on learning crucial local interactions to interpret the key residues and substrate atoms in enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Testing results indicate that the prediction performance of IECata exceeds that of state-of-the-art benchmark models. More importantly, it provides a reliable confidence assessment for these predictions. Case studies further highlight that the incorporation of uncertainty in screening for highly active enzymes can effectively increase the hit ratio, thereby improving the efficiency of experimental validation and accelerating directed enzyme evolution. To facilitate researchers' use of IECata, we have developed an online prediction platform: http://mathtc.nscc-tj.cn/cataai/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.