Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548481›Full record

ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026

Evaluation of Living Liver Donors Using Dual-Contrast-Agent Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)-Technical Development.

Anum Aslam, Mishal Mendiratta-Lala, Reve Chahine, Matthew S Davenport, Neehar D Parikh, Hero Hussain, Seth Waits, William Weadock, Christopher Sonnenday

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Utility of DynamicBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anum AslamDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6243-5286
Mishal Mendiratta-LalaDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-916X
Reve ChahineDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Matthew S DavenportDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Neehar D ParikhDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Hero HussainDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Seth WaitsDepartment of Transplant Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arsbor, Michigan, USA.
William WeadockDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Christopher SonnendayDepartment of Transplant Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arsbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The indications for liver transplantation continue to expand to meet the growing need of patients with end-stage liver disease and select hepatic malignancies. Living donor liver transplantation allows for access to transplant with recipient outcomes superior to deceased donor liver transplantation. To ensure absolute safety of the donor and optimal outcome of the recipient, potential liver donors are subjected to an exhaustive preoperative evaluation. Radiological studies play a pivotal role in assessing the donor liver anatomy to assess suitability for donation and to facilitate surgical planning. Many living donor centers supplement single-agent contrast-enhanced MRCP (gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoxetate disodium) with contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) for delineation of arterial anatomy. Excellent hepatic and portal venous mapping as well as biliary tract visualization has been seen, eliminating the need for CTA in studies. This review provides a case-based analysis of the proposed dual-contrast-enhanced MRCP protocol, emphasizing the advantages of a single diagnostic study over traditional multi-modality approaches while also discussing potential limitations and areas requiring further investigation. Evidence level: 4. Technical efficacy: Stage 1.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceContrast MediaLiverLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGadolinium DTPAHumansMaleMeglumineMiddle AgedOrganometallic CompoundsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAMeglumineOrganometallic Compoundsdual‐contrast techniquegadobenate dimegluminegadoxetate disodiumliver donor magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID40548481
PMCPMC12706685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.