Trial reportJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2025
A phase IIb single-center study to assess the efficacy of apremilast for the treatment of nummular eczema.
Trial report in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A phase IIb single-center study to assess the efficacy of apremilast for the treatment of nummular eczema.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pathogenesis of nummular eczema (NE) remains unclear, and no targeted therapy has been approved. Apremilast is a small molecule inhibitor targeting phosphodiesterase-4. PATIENTS AND
methodsA phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of apremilast or placebo in patients with NE. Patients received apremilast (30 mg BID) or placebo until week 16 followed by an open label phase in which all patients were treated with apremilast until week 32. The primary endpoint was the number of patients achieving an improvement in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) by two or more points or an absolute PGA of 0 or 1 at week 16. Secondary endpoints included changes in skin physiology, life quality, or dermato-pathology.
results33 patients were enrolled, of whom 31 were randomized to apremilast (n = 15) or placebo (n = 16). 1/15 (6.7%) patients in the apremilast group and 4/16 (25.0%) in the placebo group reached the primary endpoint (p = 0.369). There was no difference between placebo and apremilast with regard to all secondary endpoints at week 16 and week 32. The safety profile was in accordance with the known safety profile of apremilast.
conclusionPhosphodiesterase-4 inhibition by apremilast showed no beneficial effects for the treatment of NE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.