Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Examining the low uptake of LARC in Ethiopia: an analysis of individual-level predisposing and enabling factors.

Mintesnot T Teni, Travis Loux, Ness Sandoval, Anne Sebert Kuhlmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mintesnot T TeniCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Travis LouxCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Ness SandovalCollege of Arts and Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Anne Sebert KuhlmannCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: According to the 2019 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) only 11% of married reproductive-age women in Ethiopia use long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). This study aimed to identify individual characteristics associated with LARC uptake compared to short-acting contraceptives, traditional and barrier methods, and non-contraceptive use. Methods: Data from the 2019 Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Ethiopia survey ( Results: LARC uptake in this study was 9.7%. Older, single, nulliparous, and Muslim women had lower LARC use than non-contraceptive and traditional/barrier method use. When compared to short-acting method use, low LARC use was associated with smaller household size and no exposure to family planning information. When compared to all other groups, contraceptive autonomy was associated with higher LARC uptake. Younger women and women living in rural areas were less likely to use IUDs than implants. Discussion: Policymakers could use these findings to tailor interventions to specific populations with low LARC uptake. Training providers on counseling and LARC eligibility could help improve LARC uptake among populations, including less-empowered women. Involving religious leaders in contraceptive health education has the potential to increase LARC use.

Indexed as

Andersen's Behavioral Modelcontraceptive useenabling factorsEthiopialong acting reversible contraception (LARC)predisposing factors

Identifiers

PMID40548325
PMCPMC12179146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.