Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548313›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2025

Comparative shotgun proteomics analysis of wheat gluten proteins digested by various peptidases.

Christine Kaemper, Johanna Mossburger, Manuel Geyer, Lorenz Hartl, Sabrina Geisslitz, Katharina Anne Scherf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine KaemperDepartment of Bioactive and Functional Food Chemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Johanna MossburgerDepartment of Bioactive and Functional Food Chemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Manuel GeyerBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Lorenz HartlBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Sabrina GeisslitzLeibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Katharina Anne ScherfDepartment of Bioactive and Functional Food Chemistry, Institute of Applied Biosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wheat flour proteome is a complex mixture of non-gluten and gluten proteins. The large number of repetitive sequences, special amino acid composition and similarity of gluten protein isoforms pose a major challenge in bottom-up proteomics. The standard peptidase used in shotgun proteomics is trypsin, which may not be suitable for all wheat proteins. In this study, flour extracts of nine common wheat genotypes were digested with the peptidases trypsin, chymotrypsin, thermolysin, pepsin and the combination of trypsin and chymotrypsin. The results showed large differences for the number of identified peptides. With 4115 peptides, trypsin resulted in by far the most peptide identifications, followed by thermolysin with 1421 peptides. However, this no longer applied at protein level. Most metabolic protein groups (673) were identified with trypsin. Among the gluten protein groups, however, around 130 were identified with each peptidase. The ω-gliadins were detected with all peptidases except trypsin. A comparison with quantitative RP-UHPLC-UV results showed that there was the greatest overlap after thermolysin digestion. Otherwise, there was no great similarity between the different peptidases, which is why their results cannot be compared with one another. The sequence coverage of gluten proteins was 51 % after thermolysin digestion, 27 % after trypsin digestion and 61 % when all peptidases were evaluated together. The results showed that digestion with various peptidases provides a more detailed picture of the wheat proteome. Some wheat protein groups could only be identified with certain peptidases, which is important if these protein groups are to be studied in more detail.

Indexed as

Bottom-up proteomicsEnzymatic hydrolysisGliadinGluteninLabel-free quantificationTriticum aestivumUntargeted mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID40548313
PMCPMC12182313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.