ArticleEvolutionary applications2025
Adaptive Introgression as an Evolutionary Force: A Meta-Analysis of Knowledge Trends.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early hominin arrival in Southeast Asia triggered the evolution of major human malaria vectors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rapid genome-wide introgression reveals fitness advantage of immigrant genotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is growing evidence for the role of introgressive hybridization in promoting species adaptation (i.e., adaptive introgression) owing to increasing genomic studies on a diversity of taxa over the past decades. However, introgressive hybridization was, and still is, regarded as a homogenizing process hindering the evolutionary process of adaptation to selection pressures. Despite methodological advances, key gaps remain in understanding how adaptive introgression due to hybridization functions across taxonomic groups and biological levels. This study has three objectives: (1) to explore historical trends in the understanding of adaptive introgression, particularly its genomic and functional dimensions; (2) to investigate structural organismal characteristics influencing patterns of adaptive introgression; and (3) to evaluate how adaptive introgression interacts with counteracting evolutionary mechanisms. We carried out a systematic review of the adaptive introgression literature and a multidimensional meta-analysis. The current knowledge trends have been shaped by the genomic revolution. Since 2012, genomic studies have contributed to establishing a clearer understanding of adaptive introgression. The amount and variety of published studies increased from bacteria to mammals across a complexity gradient, focusing on the genomic level and progressively having consequences at a greater number of levels of biological organization (from physiological and demographic to behavioral/ecological). Testing for tendencies, our study also revealed evolutionary mechanisms linked to adaptive introgression co-occurring with divergence forces, demonstrating that these processes are not mutually exclusive, even when they act in opposite directions, i.e., convergence and divergence, such as autosomal introgression (versus islands of differentiation in sex-linked chromosomes), balancing selection (versus genetic drift), or sexual selection (versus assortative mating). This balance is mediated by environmental conditions as they are frequently reported in the studies, regardless of the organisms' structural complexity, shaping the path of the evolutionary process of introgressing species. Studying introgression patterns has important implications for understanding adaptation in rapidly changing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.