Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548206›Full record

ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025

The Impact of Self-Management Interventions on Behavioral and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence From 2003-2024.

Sirikarn Hanrop, Nirunya Narupan, Nattaya Praha, Lalipat Phianhasin, Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sirikarn HanropDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nirunya NarupanDepartment of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0003-3207-491X
Nattaya PrahaDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0000-0924-4974
Lalipat PhianhasinDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suebsarn RuksakulpiwatDepartment of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2168-5195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and synthesize evidence on the impact of self-management interventions in improving behavioral and clinical outcomes among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across eight electronic databases-CINAHL Plus with Full Text, ProQuest, PubMed, Medline with Full Text, SAGE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science-to identify studies published from inception to 2024. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies assessing self-management interventions in individuals with SLE were included. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data synthesis followed a convergent integrated analysis framework to identify recurring themes and subthemes. Results: A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 10 randomized controlled trials (66.67%) and 5 quasi-experimental studies (33.33%). The interventions targeted physical, mental, and behavioral health through various strategies. The most common interventions included counseling and education (7 studies, 22.58%), followed by physical activity programs (2 studies, 6.45%), and self-management sessions (2 studies, 6.45%). Other interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, strengthening exercises, and digital health tools, were also implemented. In-person interventions (46.67%) were the most common delivery format, followed by digital platforms (26.67%). Self-management interventions led to significant improvements in physical health (eg, reduced fatigue and improved functional capacity), mental health (eg, reduced anxiety and depression), and health behaviors (eg, enhanced adherence to treatment and self-care practices). Furthermore, the interventions contributed to an improved quality of life by addressing the physical, psychological, and social challenges faced by individuals with SLE. Conclusion: Self-management interventions positively impact behavioral and clinical outcomes in individuals with SLE. Future research should explore long-term sustainability, integration of digital health strategies, and personalized approaches. Expanding access to self-management programs, particularly in low-resource settings, may further enhance outcomes for individuals with SLE.

Indexed as

interventionself-managementsystematic reviewsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID40548206
PMCPMC12182245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.