Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548184›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2025

The Environmental and Ecological Benefits of Edible Insects: A Review.

Belay Gezahegn Gebreyes, Tilahun A Teka

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gluten-Free Cakes WithFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Belay Gezahegn GebreyesDepartment of Postharvest Management Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Jimma Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2042-8541
Tilahun A TekaEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Teppi Agricultural Research Center Teppi Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-1067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are essential for human health, traditionally sourced from animal products like meat, eggs, and fish, or plant-based alternatives such as legumes. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa, where resources are limited, protein intake is often a challenge. With the global population rising rapidly and traditional protein sources under strain, innovative and sustainable alternatives are needed. Edible insects, once overlooked, are now recognized as a promising solution due to their high nutritional value and environmental benefits. Consumed globally in various cultures, insects provide a nutritious, unconventional protein source with significantly lower environmental impacts than conventional livestock, aligning with sustainability goals. This review examines the nutrient composition of edible insects, focusing on their protein, fat, amino acids, mineral content, and digestibility. It also highlights the role of insects as pollinators and contributors to biodiversity, emphasizing their importance in supporting agriculture. Additionally, the review explores processing techniques for developing insect-based products. The nutritional value of edible insects varies based on the substrate used for rearing. By understanding insects' potential in human nutrition, we can address challenges posed by population growth while promoting a sustainable, eco-friendly food system that benefits both human health and the environment.

Indexed as

alternative protein sourceedible insectsenvironmental benefitfood chainhealth benefit

Identifiers

PMID40548184
PMCPMC12181085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.