ReviewFood science & nutrition2025
The Environmental and Ecological Benefits of Edible Insects: A Review.
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutritional Composition, Chemical Safety, and Microbiological Quality of Farmed Palm Weevil Larvae (Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Gluten-Free Cakes WithFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Increasing the Acceptability of Insect-Based Foods as Future Foods: A Comprehensive Review of Barriers, Strategies, and Pathways to Mainstream Adoption.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Insects as an Alternative Protein Source: A Sustainable Approach to Future Food Security.Insects · 2026Review
- Indigenous knowledge-based production practices and utilization of stingless bee honey in humid Afromontane Forest zones of the Southwest and Semi-Arid Forest zone of Ethiopia.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2026Article
- The Environmental and Ecological Benefits of Edible Insects: A Review.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins are essential for human health, traditionally sourced from animal products like meat, eggs, and fish, or plant-based alternatives such as legumes. In regions like sub-Saharan Africa, where resources are limited, protein intake is often a challenge. With the global population rising rapidly and traditional protein sources under strain, innovative and sustainable alternatives are needed. Edible insects, once overlooked, are now recognized as a promising solution due to their high nutritional value and environmental benefits. Consumed globally in various cultures, insects provide a nutritious, unconventional protein source with significantly lower environmental impacts than conventional livestock, aligning with sustainability goals. This review examines the nutrient composition of edible insects, focusing on their protein, fat, amino acids, mineral content, and digestibility. It also highlights the role of insects as pollinators and contributors to biodiversity, emphasizing their importance in supporting agriculture. Additionally, the review explores processing techniques for developing insect-based products. The nutritional value of edible insects varies based on the substrate used for rearing. By understanding insects' potential in human nutrition, we can address challenges posed by population growth while promoting a sustainable, eco-friendly food system that benefits both human health and the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.