ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025
Monitoring of Early Skin Reactions by Optical Coherence Tomography and Dermatoscopy in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04610645 (Live Laser Microscopic Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Live Laser Microscopic Evaluation (OCT) of Radiation Induced Preclinical Alterations of the Skin in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishing a robust preclinical model to investigate early and late radiation-induced skin reactions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy (RT) may experience pronounced acute skin reactions. We tested whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) and dermatoscopy could detect and monitor early subclinical RT-induced skin changes and might be used as a noninvasive prediction tool for higher-grade acute toxicity. Methods and Materials: Handheld OCT and dermatoscopy were used to monitor skin conditions during RT in head and neck cancer patients. Images were reviewed for typical and suspicious features facilitated by electronic image analyses. Radiation toxicity was graded weekly by a radiation oncologist. Machine learning was used to analyze the recorded data and to extract features, patterns/anomalies, and risk prediction values for high-grade radiation toxicity. Results: The most common skin features during RT observed by OCT were expressions of hyperkeratosis, blister formation, and in selected cases, formation of extensive microvascular structures or stratification disorder. Dermatoscopy revealed an almost linear increase in skin redness and saturation over the course of RT. By integrating all imaging and clinical data from RT weeks 1 to 3, it was possible to predict an increased risk of severe radiation toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or higher) in the second half of RT. A prediction accuracy of 72%, 75%, and 77% was achieved with OCT and clinical assessment, dermatoscopy and clinical assessment, and all 3 modes combined, respectively. Conclusions: OCT and dermatoscopy can detect early radiation-induced skin changes at a subclinical level. Dermatoscopy is more accessible, whereas OCT requires training and further electronic processing to interpret images. Dermatoscopy, but not OCT, can quantify skin color changes, whereas OCT is able to deliver unique information on epidermal suspicious microstructural changes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.