Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548160›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Local Control After Adjuvant Radiosurgery for Spinal Metastasis Treated With Decompression and Posterior Segmental Stabilization: A Comparison Between Carbon Fiber/Polyetheretherketone-Based and Metallic Implants.

Romulo A Andrade-Almeida, Francisco Call-Orellana, Juan P Zuluaga-Garcia, Esteban Ramirez-Ferrer, Gil Kimchi, Brian S De, Alexandre B Guimaraes, Christopher A Alvarez-Breckenridge, Jing Li, Amol J Ghia and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Safety and efficacy of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone implants in primary and metastatic spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Romulo A Andrade-AlmeidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Francisco Call-OrellanaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Juan P Zuluaga-GarciaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Esteban Ramirez-FerrerDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gil KimchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Brian S DeDepartment of CNS Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Alexandre B GuimaraesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Christopher A Alvarez-BreckenridgeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jing LiDepartment of CNS Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Amol J GhiaDepartment of CNS Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Laurence RhinesDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Martin C TomDepartment of CNS Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chenyang WangDepartment of CNS Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Thomas H BeckhamDepartment of CNS Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Behrang AminiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Robert Y NorthDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Claudio E TatsuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFRP) spinal implants are gaining popularity in the surgical management of spinal metastasis because of their physical and radiographic properties, which facilitate adjuvant radiation planning and tumor surveillance. Their impact on clinical outcomes is still under investigation. We evaluated the role of hardware material (CFRP vs titanium) in local control and hardware durability in metastatic cases receiving decompressive surgery and adjuvant spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS). Methods and Materials: This single-institution, retrospective cohort study was approved by the local institutional review board. Patients who underwent decompressive surgery with posterior segmental instrumentation followed by treatment with SSRS for metastatic spine disease were included. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) cervical implants, (2) mixed-type hardware, (3) SSRS greater than 60 days after surgery, and (4) less than 3 months magnetic resonance imaging follow-up. Only tumor progression occurring inside or at the margins of the irradiated field was considered. Results: Eighty-three spinal segments (55 titanium, 28 CFRP; from 82 patients) were evaluated. Except for the number of radiation fractions, proportion of single-fraction 24 Gy cases, and radiation equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions, no significant differences were found between groups. The median follow-up time was 14.5 months (range, 3.0-70.4 months). Sixteen local progressions were identified, with 15 in the titanium group ( Conclusions: CFRP implants were associated with lower rates of local progression in crude analyses, but did not reach statistical significance in multivariable models. No differences in hardware durability were identified.

Identifiers

PMID40548160
PMCPMC12182295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.