Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548159›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Computed Tomography Scan Planning in Radiation Oncology: Prospective Evaluation of the "Mini-CT Scan" Procedure Prior to a Routine Immediate Planning Computed Tomography Scan Practice. Results of the OPTIMAL Study.

Kamel Debbi, Sarah Witmeyer, Alexander Bennassi, Chahrazed Boukhobza, Gloria Fonteneau, Nhu Hanh To, Gabriele Coraggio, Wassim Ksouri, Noémie Grellier, Mohamed Aziz Cherif and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kamel DebbiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Sarah WitmeyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Alexander BennassiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Chahrazed BoukhobzaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Gloria FonteneauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Nhu Hanh ToDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Gabriele CoraggioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Wassim KsouriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Noémie GrellierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Mohamed Aziz CherifDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Gokoulakrichenane LoganadaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Yazid BelkacemiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
AROME (Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology of the Mediterranean Area; www.aromecancer.org) and Transatlantic Radiation Oncology Network (TRONE)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the benefit/risk in terms of radioprotection of performing a mini-computed tomography (CT) scan prior to the planning CT scan in patients requiring pelvic irradiation. The study population included patients who received curative intent external beam radiation therapy for pelvic malignancies. The results are applicable to all supine pelvic external beam radiation therapy patients. Methods and Materials: Between April 9, 2021, and October 5, 2021, 53 patients were included in the study. A mini-CT scan was performed for each patient to determine whether they were properly prepared with a full bladder and empty rectum for the planning CT scan. Depending on the result, it was decided to either perform the planning CT scan or repeat a mini scan after rectal enema and drinking to better empty the rectum and fill the bladder. Up to 3 mini scans could be performed, after which a new CT appointment was scheduled if the patient was considered not sufficiently prepared. Results: Among the 53 patients included in the study, 64 wide CT scans were performed (average, 1.2 scans per patient). A total of 47, 3, 2, and 1 patients were treated for prostate, rectal, bladder, and anal canal cancers, respectively. The median age was 75 years (range, 57-94), with 51 men and 2 women. For 29 patients, a single mini-CT scan was performed prior to the wide CT scan, corresponding to an additional mean effective dose of 2.3 mSv to the mini-CT scan. For 25 patients, multiple wide CT scans and mini-CT scans were performed. For these patients, the mini-CT scan allowed us to decrease patient exposure by reducing the average effective dose by 22.1 mSv per patient. The systematic use of a mini-CT scan in the whole cohort allowed reducing the mean effective dose by 9.44 mSv based on a paired Conclusions: We demonstrated that the effective dose delivered to the patient was significantly lower if we carried out 1 or more mini-CT scans to avoid doing iterative planning CT scans that deliver a higher dose to the patient.

Identifiers

PMID40548159
PMCPMC12182286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.