Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548156›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Human-Centered Design and Development in Digital Health: Approaches, Challenges, and Emerging Trends.

Katerina D Tzimourta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Quality Appraisal of Telerehabilitation Guidelines: A Systematic Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katerina D TzimourtaElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, Kozani, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-centered design (HCD) has emerged as a critical approach for developing digital health technologies that are usable, acceptable, and effective within complex healthcare environments. Rooted in systems theory, ergonomics, and information systems research, HCD prioritizes the needs, capabilities, and limitations of diverse user groups - including patients, clinicians, and caregivers - throughout the design and implementation process. This review synthesizes current applications of HCD in four key domains: brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR), artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems AI-CDSS, and mobile health (mHealth) technologies. It explores design frameworks, usability strategies, and models of human-technology collaboration that contribute to successful adoption and sustained use. Ethical and legal considerations - such as data privacy, informed consent, and algorithmic fairness - are also addressed, particularly in contexts involving biometric and neurophysiological data. While HCD practices have shown substantial potential to improve digital health outcomes, their implementation remains uneven across technologies and settings. Emerging trends, including adaptive personalization, explainable AI, and participatory co-design, are identified as promising directions for the development of more inclusive, trustworthy, and sustainable digital health innovations.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfacesclinical decision support systemsdigital healthhuman-centered designmhealthsocio-technical systemsuser experience

Identifiers

PMID40548156
PMCPMC12181036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.