ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025
World's First Artificial Intelligence-Based Evaluation of Rist Catheter Stability in Transradial Procedures: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time AI-Generated Guidewire-Out-of-View Notifications in Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: Higher Observed Rates Among Trainees.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Initial Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Anchoring Exchange Device: AI-based Quantitative Distal Tip-Motion Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection of Flow-Directed Microcatheter Tip Markers.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise for advancing neuroendovascular therapy through device evaluation, but its application in real-world clinical settings remains limited. We aimed to validate the feasibility of AI-based quantitative device evaluation during actual procedures by assessing the stability of the Rist radial access guide catheter (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland), a novel device designed for the increasingly adopted transradial approach (TRA), during flow diverter stent (FDS) placement. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 4 cases of FDS placement using Rist via the TRA. Rist was tracked in recorded fluoroscopic videos using the AI technology of Neuro-Vascular Assist (iMed Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). The movement distance of Rist during FDS placement was calculated as a stability indicator. Results: All procedures were successfully completed without any complications. Rist was introduced from the radial artery and positioned in the distal internal carotid artery. The maximum movement distances of the Rist during the procedures were 3.36, 6.63, 1.79, and 0.33 mm for each case, respectively, with an average of 3.03 mm. The maximum movement distances per minute were 1.68, 2.34, 1.19, and 0.46 mm/min, respectively, with a mean of 1.42 mm/min. These measurements suggest sufficient stability for the FDS procedures. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using AI technology to quantitatively analyze Rist stability in TRA procedures. To the best of our knowledge, this is the 1st clinical evaluation of device function in a clinical setting using AI technology. Further studies with more cases are required to validate these findings. This method is promising for real-world device evaluation and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.