ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Prediction of metastatic risk of renal clear cell carcinoma based on CT radiomics analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the value of using imaging histological models to non-invasively assess the risk of metastasis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 273 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients from three hospitals, with 57 cases allocated as an independent test cohort. High-throughput imaging histomic features (n=2,264) were extracted from triphasic CT (non-enhanced, corticomedullary, and nephrographic phases) using Pyradiomics. Three monophasic radiomics models were developed following dimensionality reduction, with feature contributions quantified via Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to enhance interpretability. A triphasic radiomics model was subsequently established by ensembling phase-specific prediction probabilities. Metastasis risk factors identified through univariate/multivariate logistic regression informed a clinical predictor model. The final combined model integrated triphasic radiomics signatures with clinical parameters, visualized through a nomogram. Diagnostic performance was evaluated via ROC analysis, while calibration curves validated prediction consistency. Results: In this study, SHAP analysis revealed that radiomics features quantifying intratumoral heterogeneity (e.g., necrosis patterns in medullary-phase CT) synergized with clinical factors (tumor size >3 cm, creatinine levels) to drive predictions. Key biological insights included threshold effects of necrosis volume (linked to hypoxia) and tumor diameter (critical threshold: 3 cm), aligning with known metastatic pathways. The clinical model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.752 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.679-0.826) in the training dataset and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.529-0.833) in the testing dataset. Among the single-phase radiomics models, the CT_Medullary model demonstrated good prediction performance, with an AUROC of 0.785 (95% CI: 0.645-0.924) in the testing dataset. The three-phased CT model exhibited improved diagnostic performance, with a testing AUROC rising to 0.812 (95% CI: 0.680-0.943). Notably, the combined model integrating clinical and radiomics features yielded the best prediction, achieving a further improvement in testing AUROC to 0.824 (95% CI: 0.704-0.944). Conclusion: Radiomics technology provides a quantitative, objective method for predicting the risk of metastasis in patients with ccRCC. Nonetheless, the clinical indicators persist as irreplaceable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.