ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of Eribulin-based chemotherapy in HER2 negative advanced breast cancer patients: a real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is recognized as one of the most common cancers worldwide, exhibiting a notably high incidence rate among women in China. Despite significant advancements in therapeutic approaches, the prognosis for patients diagnosed with advanced stages of the disease remains poor. Therefore, there is an urgent necessity to investigate the effectiveness and safety of treatments such as Eribulin, a non-taxane microtubule inhibitor that is recommended for use beyond second-line therapy. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study assessed 105 patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received Eribulin treatment from 2020 to 2023. Results: With a median follow-up of 13.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.0 months. Patients on early-line Eribulin had a significantly longer PFS (6.7 vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.038) than those on later lines. Combination therapy tended toward longer PFS than monotherapy (6.4 vs. 4.9 months; P = 0.319), albeit non-significantly. Combinations with PD-1 inhibitors or chemotherapy had a higher PFS than those with anti-angiogenic agents (P = 0.022). Among ER-negative patients in the combination therapy subgroup, HER2-zero tumors had a significantly longer PFS than HER2-low tumors (9.5 vs. 4.1 months, P = 0.026). The most frequently observed adverse events were hematological toxicity, with the majority classified as manageable in severity. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the potential of Eribulin in the treatment of HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, highlighting the need for further large-scale, prospective studies to refine and enhance treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.