ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
The evaluation of the efficacy and safety about apatinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Apatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise as third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study compared the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with ICIs versus apatinib monotherapy in AGC patients after second-line treatment failure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 48 AGC patients with postoperative recurrence/metastasis treated at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between January 2018 and September 2022. Patients received either apatinib plus ICIs (n=23) or apatinib alone (n=25). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); Secondary endpoints included safety and subgroup analyses. Results: With median follow-up of 4.25 months, the combination group showed significantly longer median OS (6.0 vs 3.0 months, HR=0.44, 95%CI 0.24-0.82, Conclusion: Apatinib combined with ICIs demonstrated improved survival outcomes compared to apatinib monotherapy in AGC, particularly for patients with liver metastasis, without increasing severe toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.