Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548099›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025

Spinal cord stimulator utilization trends and predictors of unsuccessful trial-to-implant conversion.

Wesley Day, Gwyneth C Maloy, Adam D Winter, Kenneth B Chapman, Anthony E Seddio, Rushabh H Doshi, Philip P Ratnasamy, Arya G Varthi, Mitchell S Fourman, Jonathan N Grauer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07743905 (Virtual Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07743905 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArkansasRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Pain, Chronic Pain Due to Injury, Failed Back Syndrome, Persistent Spinal Pain SyndromeArmsSCS-PNE intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. General Innovations in Pain Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wesley DayDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Gwyneth C MaloyDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Adam D WinterDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Kenneth B ChapmanSpine and Pain Institute of NY, Staten Island, NY, United States.
Anthony E SeddioDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Rushabh H DoshiDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Philip P RatnasamyDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Arya G VarthiDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Mitchell S FourmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Montefiore Einstein Health System, Bronx, NY, United States.
Jonathan N GrauerDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

Short-Term Reserch Training: Students in Health SchoolsT35HL007649 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Erica L Herzog · 1987 to 2026
$5.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) are neuromodulatory devices that may be considered for refractory back or neurologic pain. Trends in SCS utilization and factors associated with failure of trial-to-implant conversion are not well defined. Methods: Using the 2010 - 2022 PearlDiver Mariner Patient Claims Database, adults who underwent SCS trial were identified and categorized into those who did or did not undergo conversion to permanent SCS implantation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinical (age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and tobacco use) and non-clinical (insurance plan and US geographic region) characteristics associated with lower odds of trial-to-implant conversion.The annual incidences of SCS utilization, trial-to-implant conversion, and breakdown of specialties performing SCS implantation (pain specialists, neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons) were analyzed. Results: Of 265,756 patients undergoing SCS trial, 178,144 (67%) went on to receive permanent implant while 87,612 (33%) did not. Factors independently associated with lower odds of successful trial-to-implant conversion included: older age (OR: 0.97 per decade increase), male sex (OR: 0.93, relative to female), lower comorbidity burden (OR: 0.96 per 1-point ECI decrease), no documented tobacco use (OR: 0.94), insurance (relative to Commercial, Medicaid [OR: 0.78] and Medicare [OR: 0.85]) and geographic region (relative to Midwest, Northeast [OR: 0.63], West [OR: 0.82], and South [OR: 0.85]) ( Conclusions: The overall utilization of SCS and trial-to-implant conversion rates have increased over the years. By defining clinical and nonclinical factors associated with failure for conversion from trial to implant, selection processes can be further optimized by specialists performing these procedures.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyHealthcare utilizationLow back painNeuromodulationRadiculopathySpinal cord stimulator

Identifiers

PMID40548099
PMCPMC12182330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.