Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40548082›Full record

ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2025

Toward a Collaborative, Collective, and Integrative International Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Security Education.

Iris Magne, Olivia Ibbotson, Lijun Shang, Malcolm Dando

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iris MagneBiological Security Research Centre, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9353-5586
Olivia IbbotsonBiological Security Research Centre, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9039-3531
Lijun ShangBiological Security Research Centre, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-5903
Malcolm DandoBiological Security Research Centre, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the entry into force of the 1975 Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention (BTWC) and the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) many years ago, the risk of malign use of chemistry and biology has been a consistently growing threat. Various initiatives have been proposed to address chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) security issues, particularly on the issue of dual-use research of concern (DURC). Methods: In this article, we first briefly review the history and evolution of chemical and biological security education. Then we discuss the challenges faced among the initiatives developed to strengthen the BTWC and CWC. We further analyze the lessons learned for establishing global biosecurity education, and we conclude that international collaboration and coordination are keys to raising awareness of the necessity for biological security education. In the end, we detail our new initiative entitled the International Biological Security Education Network (IBSEN), which aims to provide this needed global framework through developing resources in biosecurity education in collaboration with international and regional actors using new methodologies and a linguistic plurality. Discussion: We believe that a collaborative, collective, and integrative international CBRN security education is the key to ensuring a broad engagement in biosecurity education and addressing the issue of DURC.

Indexed as

Biological and Toxin Weapons ConventionbiosecurityCBRN securityChemical Weapons Conventiondual-use research of concern

Identifiers

PMID40548082
PMCPMC12179351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.