ArticleBMJ public health2025
Sexual and reproductive health in Pakistan: a qualitative exploratory study of gender roles, family planning and adolescent health in Chitral, Gilgit-Baltistan and Sindh.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sexual and reproductive health has been gaining more and more attention due to its all-encompassing definitions and inclusivity of all people, including the marginalised. However, social taboos, lack of political will, broken healthcare system, and sociocultural and economic factors continue to stand as barriers to normalising sexual and reproductive health. This paper explores this topic through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews (IDIs) (exploring both through FGD and direct view from IDIs) in Chitral, Gilgit-Baltistan and Sindh, Pakistan. Methodology: This qualitative study was conducted using a descriptive exploratory approach. The target population comprised community members from two districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa-Upper and Lower Chitral-as well as two districts in Sindh and six districts in Gilgit-Baltistan. These groups included married adults (aged 18-51), adolescent girls and boys (aged 14-21) and healthcare workforce members. 57 FGDs were conducted with the community and healthcare professionals between October 2020 and December 2020. A purposive sampling technique was used to identify participants, and data analysis was conducted simultaneously with data collection. Consent was obtained from each participant. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes, through using manual method and NVivo. Results: Identified themes include gender inequality, adolescent health, family planning, maternal health and sexual and reproductive health. Discussion: Gender inequality in Chitral and Sindh, Pakistan, significantly impacts gaps in the healthcare system, adolescent health, sexual and reproductive health, maternal health, and family planning. The lack of access to healthcare in Chitral and rural Sindh, coupled with gender inequality, significantly impacts family planning. The limited availability of modern contraception and secondary family planning education worsens these difficulties. It will take a broad strategy to address these problems, including initiatives to promote access to family planning services, boost access to education for girls and strengthen the healthcare system in the region. Conclusions: There is a need to take a multidimensional approach that promotes women's empowerment, community involvement and focused investments in healthcare facilities and services to address gender disparity and improve access to healthcare. To accomplish these objectives, it is essential to increase educational accessibility, support gender-sensitive policies and initiatives and invest in the training of the healthcare workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.