ArticleAcademic pathology
Interactive online clinicopathologic case simulations in coagulation disorders for pathology residency programs: A multi-institutional study.
Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning coagulation disorders can be challenging to trainees given the rarity of these diseases and the differences in case volume among different training programs. In addition, the work-up is frequently done in a piecemeal fashion with multiple tests ordered before the involvement of trainees; this precludes independent judgment on work-up. To address these deficiencies, we evaluated the usefulness of an interactive online case-based coagulation module in four American College of Graduate Medical Education-accredited pathology training programs. Nine high-yield cases of coagulation disorders were uploaded into an online system (Pathology Playground). Fifty trainees were provided a link to work up the cases on their own several days before a discussion session, with three case sets and three discussion sessions in total (July-September 2024). In each session, cases were reviewed under the supervision of the pathology attending(s). Pre-assessment and post-assessment tests were administered, and a survey was distributed to trainees. The mean pre-assessment score was 62.5%, and the mean post-assessment score was 80.6%. In the survey, 85% of the participants found the module more useful than lectures/textbooks, 82% said they had a better understanding of working up cases, and 96% wanted more cases. The integration of the standardized module into the curriculum has been successful and improved the knowledge of our trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.