Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547919›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Factors associated with family physicians' perceived self-efficacy in multimorbidity management.

Filipe Prazeres, Andreia Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Filipe PrazeresFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Andreia TeixeiraRISE-Health, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity is a significant challenge for primary care. No previous research has examined self-efficacy in managing patients with multimorbidity among Portuguese family physicians. Aims: This study aims to assess self-efficacy levels in family physicians and identifying significant associations. Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study conducted among Portuguese family physicians from June to August 2024. A non-probability snowball sampling method was used to distribute a web-based survey. Ten independent variables (sex, age, marital status, children, professional stage, years of experience, workplace, work-family conflict, perceived organizational support and physician burden) were studied with the outcome variable - perceived self-efficacy. Multiple logistic regression model was performed. Results: 102 family physicians completed the online questionnaire, with a median age of 38 years and a median work experience of 10.5 years. The majority of the sample were female (78.4%), married/cohabiting (70.6%), and employed in family health units (87.3%). Sixty-nine participants (67.6%) perceived their self-efficacy in multimorbidity management as high (Likert scale ratings 4 or 5). In the multivariate analysis being single, divorced, or widowed; having children; being a family physician trainee; and experiencing physician burden were associated with a reduced odds of perceived self-efficacy in managing multimorbidity. Conclusion: The findings of the present study highlight the importance of addressing physician burden to improve perceived self-efficacy in managing multimorbidity. Therefore, efforts should focus on reducing this burden by alleviating workplace stress and providing targeted training in managing multimorbidity. Improving self-efficacy is expected to encourage physicians to engage in proactive, patient-centered care, leading to better health outcomes.

Indexed as

multimorbidityperceived organizational support (POS)physician burdenprimary careself-efficacywork-family conflict (WFC)

Identifiers

PMID40547919
PMCPMC12179078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.