ReviewCurrent research in microbial sciences2025
The rise and evolving role of
Review in Current research in microbial sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- IsGut microbes · 2026Review
- Review
- The forgotten organ: Why the oral microbiome belongs in every physician's toolkit.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
- Impact of sudanese chewing tobacco toombak on oral bacteria - a culture-based pilot study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- AI-2 production inJournal of bacteriology · 2026Article
- Fusobacterium nucleatum, succinate signaling, and immunotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer: clinical relevance and translational opportunities.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Article
- Quantification of EctopicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Common genetic variants in vitamin D metabolism-related genes affect gut microbiota diversity in postmenopausal women.Genes & nutrition · 2026Article
- The Role ofBiomedicines · 2026Review
- Fusobacterium nucleatum manipulates host autophagy to promote its intracellular survival and treatment resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Molecular cancer · 2026Article
- Taxonomy, carcinogenic mechanisms, and advanced molecular diagnosis of Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal cancer: from bench to clinical practice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From oral dysbiosis to colorectal cancer: reframing fusobacterium nucleatum as an oxidative stress-primed oncobion.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Invasive guests: the role of non-oral bacteria in oral dysbiosis and systemic health.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
- Microbe-driven immune suppression in colorectal cancer: theFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Association between oral microbial shifts and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
- The Role of Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis: A Comprehensive Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Oral Microbiota and Carcinogenesis: Exploring the Systemic Impact of Oral Pathogens.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Does a link exist between oral microbiota and oral squamous cell carcinoma? A review of current insights.Journal of oral microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review examines the classification, distribution, and detection methods of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.