ArticleCurrent research in food science2025
Dynamic concordance between subjective and facial EMG hedonic responses during the consumption of gel-type food.
Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural network dynamics associated with facial and subjective emotional responses.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Integrating Cutting-Edge Technologies in Food Sensory and Consumer Science: Applications and Future Directions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concordance between subjective and facial hedonic responses while eating is informative, both practically and theoretically. Recent psychophysiological studies reported that hedonic ratings during the consumption of gel-type food were negatively associated with facial electromyography (EMG) signals recorded from the corrugator supercilii and positively associated with those from chewing-related muscles. However, the relationships were tested in a static manner, and the dynamic subjective-facial concordance remains untested. Therefore, we investigated this by assessing participants' dynamic valence ratings and recording their facial EMG from the corrugator supercilii, zygomatic major, masseter, and suprahyoid muscles while they chewed and swallowed gel-type food stimuli of various flavors. Cross-correlations with dynamic valence ratings were negative for corrugator supercilii EMG signals and positive for zygomatic major, masseter, and suprahyoid EMG signals during both chewing and swallowing. These findings indicate that subjective hedonic experiences and facial EMG signals are dynamically coupled during the consumption of food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.