Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547841›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025

Normal and slow learners: a new discriminative method based on the speed of spatial learning in aged mice.

Céline Duffau, Senka Hadzibegovic, Vojislav Andelkovic, Bruno Bontempi, Olivier Nicole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Céline Duffau *Faculty of Science, Brigham Young University - Hawaii, Laie, HI, United States.
Senka Hadzibegovic *INCIA, CNRS UMR 5287, Bordeaux, France.
Vojislav AndelkovicINCIA, CNRS UMR 5287, Bordeaux, France.
Bruno BontempiINCIA, CNRS UMR 5287, Bordeaux, France.
Olivier NicoleUniversity of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is accompanied by a decline in cognitive functions, including spatial memory, yet significant variability exists in the learning abilities of older individuals. Using a large cohort of aged and young male mice, we employed spatial discrimination testing in an 8-arm radial maze to investigate age-related differences in performance in spatial learning and to categorize individual memory phenotypes within the aged population. Despite a general learning ability across groups, aged mice showed slower acquisition rates compared to young counterparts, highlighting age-related cognitive difficulties in establishing or discriminating spatial representations. By modeling individual learning curves, we classified aged mice into two subgroups-normal learners (NL) and slow learners (SL)-based on learning speed. SL mice demonstrated significantly delayed spatial memory acquisition compared to NL and young mice, suggesting pronounced heterogeneity in cognitive aging. This method provides a robust framework to explore the neurobiological underpinnings of learning deficits and may inform the development of targeted interventions to mitigate age-related memory decline.

Indexed as

agingindividual differencenormal agingradial arm mazespatial memory

Identifiers

PMID40547841
PMCPMC12179159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.