ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Normal and slow learners: a new discriminative method based on the speed of spatial learning in aged mice.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protective role of hemokinin-1 against age-dependent spatial memory and attention decline in mice.GeroScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging is accompanied by a decline in cognitive functions, including spatial memory, yet significant variability exists in the learning abilities of older individuals. Using a large cohort of aged and young male mice, we employed spatial discrimination testing in an 8-arm radial maze to investigate age-related differences in performance in spatial learning and to categorize individual memory phenotypes within the aged population. Despite a general learning ability across groups, aged mice showed slower acquisition rates compared to young counterparts, highlighting age-related cognitive difficulties in establishing or discriminating spatial representations. By modeling individual learning curves, we classified aged mice into two subgroups-normal learners (NL) and slow learners (SL)-based on learning speed. SL mice demonstrated significantly delayed spatial memory acquisition compared to NL and young mice, suggesting pronounced heterogeneity in cognitive aging. This method provides a robust framework to explore the neurobiological underpinnings of learning deficits and may inform the development of targeted interventions to mitigate age-related memory decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.