Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547835›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2025

A retrospective cohort study comparing different fixation methods for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band.

Žygimantas Juodeikis, Gintautas Brimas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Žygimantas JuodeikisClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephro‑Urology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gintautas BrimasClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephro‑Urology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwo decades ago, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding was a leading bariatric sur‑ gery. However, its popularity has declined, with sleeve gastrectomy becoming the predominant choice. The MiniMizer Extra band used in our clinic from 2008 to 2020 was associated with band erosion primarily at its lower edge. In 2014, we started using a modified band fixation technique by placing sutures only on the upper part of the band.

aimThe aim of this study was to compare 2 different fixation techniques for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band to identify any potential differences in outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, we compared 54 patients who underwent adjustable gastric banding with the MiniMizer Extra band between January 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, with a group of 54 patients who were subjected to the procedure between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2019, using a different band fixation method.

resultsWeight loss results significantly favored the modified fixation group, with an average total weight loss of 24.2%. The overall complication rate was 12% and was significantly higher in the original fixation group. Complications included 6 cases of band erosion, 4 port‑related issues, 1 case of band slippage, and 2 cases of band intolerance.

conclusionsThe modified fixation group demonstrated improved weight loss results with fewer com‑ plications, suggesting a potential advantage in safety and efficacy of the modified technique.

Indexed as

adjustable gastric bandingbariatric and metabolic surgeryobesity

Identifiers

PMID40547835
PMCPMC12177352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.