ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2025
Preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules: virtual bronchoscopic navigation vs a 4‑hook localization needle.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Bronchoscopic Approaches to Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: a Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Techniques.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Preoperative and intraoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic surgery: a contemporary narrative review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBoth virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) and puncture with a 4‑hook localization needle are viable methods for localizing pulmonary nodules. However, there is a paucity of research that compares these 2 approaches.
aimThis study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of and complications associated with these 2 approaches to pulmonary nodule localization. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed 223 patients who underwent VBN (n = 98) or needle localization (n = 125) of pulmonary nodules between April 2020 and December 2022. Each study group was divided into 2 subgroups, namely the solitary‑nodule group and the 2‑nodule group. We collected and analyzed data on localization time, accuracy, success rate, and complications in each group.
resultsIn the solitary‑nodule subgroup, the mean (SD) distance between the localization point and the pulmonary nodule was 6.2 (6.1) mm for the needle‑localization group and 8.6 (4.8) mm for the VBN‑localization group (P = 0.01). In the 2‑nodule subgroup, the mean (SD) distance did not significantly differ and amounted to 8.7 (4.6) mm for the needle‑localization group and 8.4 (4.4) mm for the VBN‑localization group. However, the mean (SD) time required for localization was shorter in the VBN‑localization group (17.2 [2.6] min) than in the needle‑localization group (26.6 [3.9] min; P <0.001), which indicated that VBN was more efficient in 2‑nodule localization. The solitary nodule- and 2‑nodule-localization procedures differed significantly in terms of complications, such as pneumothorax and bleeding, with fewer complications reported in the VBN‑localization group.
conclusionsIn comparison with needle localization, VBN localization was associated with fewer complications. In the case of 2 pulmonary nodules, VBN localization outperformed the needle approach, with shorter localization time, fewer complications, and no radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.