ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Parents as key actors to screen early childhood development disorders: Validation of a culturally sensitive, parent-administered screening instrument using Delphi technique.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The lack of culturally sensitive screening instruments that can be administered by parents is one of the major barriers to incorporating them in the monitoring of their child's developmental progress and incorporating them in the early identification of early childhood development disorders (ECDDs). The paper presents the methods and outcomes of the validation process using the Delphi technique to develop a culturally congruent instrument appropriate to be used by the parents of infants in the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu to assess their child's developmental progress. Materials and Methods: A screening tool was developed with 64 statements/items on the red flag signs for children from age 0 to 12 months. A panel of experts then evaluated this instrument and scored each of the items, in two rounds, on 5-point Likert scales evaluating their safety and relative priority. In both the rounds, any item/statement with a median score < 5 or interquartile range > 1 was removed. Results: The validated alpha version of the tool had 45 statements split across infant's age, encompassing a comprehensive range of pediatric development domains including tone, primitive reflex, cognition, gross motor, fine motor, language communication, sensory motor, social, and problem solving. Conclusion: The cultural congruence with the Tamil population, focus on concerning signs of developmental delay, and the inclusion of a few primitive reflexes perceived by the expert panel as safe to be used by the parents/caregivers enhances the practical application of the instrument, in the early detection of ECDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.