Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547782›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Epidural analgesia and rate of cesarean section, maternal and neonatal outcomes: Retrospective study.

Nisma Almansouri, Rana Bajaba, Reham Abdulgader, Hiba Alenazi, Sarah Bahowarth, Ghaliah Abduljabar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nisma AlmansouriDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Rana BajabaDepartment of Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Reham AbdulgaderDepartment of Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hiba AlenaziDepartment of Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah BahowarthDepartment of Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ghaliah AbduljabarDepartment of Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuraxial technique is standard medical care for labor pain relief. Epidural analgesia is linked to an increased likelihood of assisted vaginal birth but does not raise the overall cesarean section (CS) delivery risk. Few studies in the Middle East and Saudi Arabia have examined epidural analgesia's effect on emergency cesarean section rates among vaginal deliveries. This retrospective study at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia included 387 term pregnant women. Patients were divided into two groups: 240 received epidural analgesia, and 147 served as controls. Inclusion criteria included women aged 18-40 with specific fetal characteristics. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed using Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon tests. Women who received epidural analgesia were younger, with lower gravidity and parity, and had a higher rate of emergency cesarean sections. No significant differences were found in instrumental delivery rates, severe tears, or postpartum hemorrhage between groups. Neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores, birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, were similar. Logistic regression indicated a higher likelihood of emergency CS with epidural analgesia, but this was insignificant in multivariable analysis. Gravidity and parity were inversely associated with emergency CS and instrumental deliveries. While epidural analgesia was linked to higher C-sections, further analysis showed no significant effect. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between groups. These findings support the safe use of epidural analgesia for labor pain management in Saudi Arabia, offering reassurance to both patients and healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Cesarean sectionsepidural analgesiainstrumental deliveriesNICUvaginal birth

Identifiers

PMID40547782
PMCPMC12178526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.