ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Awareness of third-hand smoke: A cross-sectional study among medical students at Qassim University.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thirdhand Smoke and Neonatal/Pediatric Health: A Scoping Review on Nursing Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Secondhand smoke exposure and sleep disturbances among Korean adolescents: A nationally representative cross-sectional study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Third-hand smoke refers to pollutants that linger on surfaces and in the environment well after smoking has stopped. These substances can be inhaled, ingested, or absorbed through the skin. These persistent toxins, which settle on walls, furniture, and clothing, are linked to serious health issues such as asthma, reproductive system disorders, postpartum depression, and sleep disturbances in children. Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional research design to assess the perceptions of Qassim University medical students regarding third-hand smoke. The study included 377 participants, with data collected through an electronic, self-administered Beliefs About Third-Hand Smoke (BATHS) questionnaire. The data analysis was conducted using SPSS Version 27. Results: The results show that majority of respondents believe that lingering air can harm the health of infants and children (78.6%). Almost two-thirds (74.6%) also believe that these particles are absorbed into furniture and walls, while a majority (62%) think that the particles can persist in a room for several weeks. Females demonstrated slightly higher median overall belief scores (33) compared with males (32), with a Conclusion: The study found strong awareness among medical students about the persistence and health risks of third-hand smoke. The majority of the students understood that standard ventilation cannot fully eliminate smoke particles, which can linger on surfaces and pose health risks. However, smokers were less concerned about this persistence, and perceptions varied by gender. The findings suggest a need for targeted educational programs to improve understanding of third-hand smoke among both medical students and the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.