ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Evaluation of student's performance on biopsychosocial model-Three-stage assessment using e-learning platform in a distant education program in family medicine.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The three-stage assessment, which includes clinical, individual, and contextual assessment, is a person-centred clinical method (biopsychosocial model). This method can help students and clinicians to assess biopsychosocial factors of the patient in a systematic way. Aim and Objective of the Study: To assess student performance of 'three-stage assessment-patient centred care method' using a rubric among students enrolled for fellowship in family medicine program. Methodology: It is a cross-sectional interventional study done at St John's Medical College after obtaining ethical clearance among the students of the fellowship in family medicine program batch 2023-24 and 2024-25, a total of 80 students. Results: Overall assessment mean is 19.3263 (maximum score is 26) and SD is 3.5157. The mean for the clinical assessment (6.9236, SD 1.1465) is better than individual (5.8333, SD 1.5151) and contextual assessment (6.3819, SD 1.7492). The mean score for the management plan is 12 and SD is 2.2966 (maximum score is 16). Conclusion: Student's performance of clinical assessment is better than individual and contextual (psychosocial) assessment and management. Overall performance of students on three-stage assessment is poor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.