ArticleACS omega2025
Optimized Adsorption of Dyes and Antibiotics onto Natural Acacia Ataxacantha for Water Treatment.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the potential ofAcacia Ataxacantha-(Acacia) biomass as a low-cost and effective biosorbent for removing methylene blue dye (MB) and ciprofloxacin antibiotic (CIP) from water. The biosorbent was thoroughly characterized using FTIR, BET, SEM-EDX, XRD, and TGA-DTG, confirming the presence of key functional groups (-OH, -COOH). Optimal removal was achieved at room temperature, pH 7, and a biomass dosage of 2 g/L, with short equilibrium times of 30 min for MB and 5 min for CIPfaster than many conventional adsorbents. Isotherm analysis revealed that MB adsorption followed the Temkin model, whereas CIP conformed to the Langmuir model. The latter model showed maximum adsorption capacities of 133 mg/g for MB and 171 mg/g for CIP, which are comparable to or better than those of other biosorbents. The surface coverage at 25 °C was 36% for MB and 32% for CIP, indicating partial site utilization. Kinetic studies indicated that the adsorption process fits a pseudo-second-order model. Activation energy calculations yielded 34.5 kJ/mol for MB and -23.0 kJ/mol for CIP, indicating distinct adsorption mechanisms. Thermodynamic analysis confirmed that both adsorption processes were exothermic and spontaneous at 25 °C, with MB showing stronger interaction energy than CIP. A basic cost analysis estimated the production cost of 1 kg of Acacia biosorbent at 1.54 USD. Regeneration tests showed good reusability for up to four cycles for both MB and CIP. These results suggest that Acacia is a cost-effective and sustainable biosorbent for removing MB and CIP from water, offering a practical alternative to energy-intensive treatment methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.