ArticleACS omega2025
Prediction of Melting Points of Chemicals with a Data Augmentation-Based Neural Network Approach.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The melting point (MP) of a chemical is an important physicochemical property that characterizes the transition from a solid to a liquid state. The MP is a key parameter in molecular design and relevant in many fields such as drug design and environmental science. Therefore, an accurate prediction of the MP is of huge interest. Here, we develop two graph convolutional neural network (GNN) models for the prediction of the MP: one where we do not apply a data augmentation strategy and one where we apply a data augmentation strategy. The models were developed on a data set containing 28,645 chemicals, where we removed duplicates and data points labeled as faulty. Then we split the data set into training, validation, and test sets. The model was trained on this initial data set and on a higher curated data set. Based on the data augmentation, we could enlarge the number of neurons in each of the two hidden layers in the GNN and reinforce the representation of large and complex molecules. We compared the influence of the curation step and the data augmentation and found that the curation step had no significant influence on the model performance, while the model could be improved by the application of data augmentation. With a consensus model, we achieved an rmse of 35.4 °C.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.