Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547667›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Atomic Interaction-Based Prediction of Phase Formations in High-Entropy Alloys.

Md Tohidul Islam, Stephen A Giles, Debasis Sengupta, Krishna Rajan, Scott R Broderick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Tohidul IslamDepartment of Materials Design and Innovation, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States.
Stephen A GilesCFD Research Corporation, Huntsville, Alabama 35806, United States.
Debasis SenguptaCFD Research Corporation, Huntsville, Alabama 35806, United States.
Krishna RajanDepartment of Materials Design and Innovation, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-2797
Scott R BroderickDepartment of Materials Design and Innovation, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4945-6212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-entropy alloys (HEAs) are of particular interest due to their unique combination of high strength, ductility, and fracture resistance. These properties are largely impacted by the phases and number of phases present in the alloy. Due to the enormous chemical design space, with typically five or six elements present in the alloys in addition to the various processing parameters, the prediction of the number of phases is challenging. While there have been multiple recent reports of phase predictions through data-driven models, an alternate approach is proposed and demonstrated here. In this work, phase prediction is performed using features derived from DFT-calculated pairwise interactions among constituent elements (incorporating bonding and structure) rather than relying solely on traditional elemental descriptors such as electronegativity. By focusing on atomic interaction features, our model provides a novel perspective on the phase stability in HEAs. This approach yields a predictive model for phase formation in HEAs that is comparable in accuracy to prior models while offering improved interpretability. By analyzing the contributions of various binary interactions to the prediction, the model provides insight into the atomic-scale factors influencing whether an alloy forms a single-phase solid solution (SS) or multiphase microstructure.

Identifiers

PMID40547667
PMCPMC12177746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.