Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547666›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

AI-Driven Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Review.

Fábio J N Ferreira, Agnaldo S Carneiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence-assisted lead optimization in drug discovery: bridging computational advances and translational challenges.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Semaphorins and Their Role in Neuropathic Pain.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fábio J N FerreiraUniversidade Federal do Pará, R. Augusto Corrêa, 01 - Guamá, Belém, Pará 66075-110, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7251-8026
Agnaldo S CarneiroUniversidade Federal do Pará, R. Augusto Corrêa, 01 - Guamá, Belém, Pará 66075-110, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer transformative potential to address the persistent challenges of traditional drug discovery, characterized by high costs, lengthy timelines, and low success rates. This comprehensive review critically analyzes recent advancements (2019-2024) in AI/ML methodologies across the entire drug discovery pipeline, from target identification to clinical development. We examine diverse AI techniques, including deep learning, graph neural networks, and transformers, focusing on their application in key areas such as target identification, lead discovery, hit optimization, and preclinical safety assessment. Our in-depth comparative analysis highlights the advantages, limitations, and practical challenges associated with different AI approaches, emphasizing critical factors for successful implementation such as data quality, model validation, and ethical considerations. The review synthesizes current applications, identifies persistent gapsparticularly in data accessibility, interpretability, and clinical translationand proposes future directions to unlock the full potential of AI in creating safer, more effective, and accessible medicines. By emphasizing transparent methodologies, robust validation, and ethical frameworks, this review aims to guide the responsible and impactful integration of AI into pharmaceutical research and development.

Identifiers

PMID40547666
PMCPMC12177741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.