Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547580›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Exploring how the ambidextrous leadership influences knowledge workers innovative behavior: a two stage SEM-ANN analysis.

Tingxiu Guo, Dengkai Zhang, Juanli Yang, Jintao Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tingxiu GuoSchool of Finance and Economics, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Dengkai ZhangSchool of Finance and Economics, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Juanli YangSchool of Finance and Economics, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Jintao XiaShanghai Jianqiao University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of ambidextrous leadership, which integrates transformational and transactional leadership styles, on the innovative behavior of knowledge workers. Grounded in theory of reciprocal determinism, it explores the mediating roles of perceived organizational support and self-efficacy, addressing gaps in the literature on leadership and innovation. Data were collected from 372 knowledge workers in China via an online survey, and analyzed using a two-stage methodology that combines Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess linear relationships and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) analysis to capture non-linear dynamics. The results indicate that ambidextrous leadership significantly enhances knowledge workers' innovative behavior through the mediating effects of perceived organizational support and self-efficacy, with a chain mediation effect underscoring the interplay between leadership, organizational support, and individual psychology. By integrating ambidextrous leadership with reciprocal determinism theory, this study enriches the theoretical understanding of leadership's role in fostering innovation and provides cross-cultural evidence of its applicability. The findings offer practical strategies for organizations to foster innovation by creating supportive environments and adopting adaptive leadership practices. Future research could explore longitudinal effects and investigate additional mediating or moderating variables to further deepen the understanding of leadership's impact on innovation.

Indexed as

ambidextrous leadershipinnovative behaviorknowledge workersperceived organizational supportself-efficacySEM-ANN

Identifiers

PMID40547580
PMCPMC12179793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.