Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547566›Full record

ArticleArchaeological and anthropological sciences2025

First stage in technological production of Stone Age animal teeth pendants: evidence from Zvejnieki (Latvia) and wider social implications.

Aija Macāne, Kerkko Nordqvist, Kristiina Mannermaa, Andy Needham, Diederik Pomstra, Gabriel Cifuentes Alcobendas, Jānis Reblis, Ilga Zagorska, Aimée Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archaeological and anthropological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aija MacāneDepartment of Cultures, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8839-6438
Kerkko NordqvistHelsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8696-1707
Kristiina MannermaaDepartment of Cultures, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8510-1120
Andy NeedhamCentre for Artefacts and Materials Analysis, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4302-1568
Diederik PomstraFaculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-1770
Gabriel Cifuentes AlcobendasDepartment of History and Philosophy, University of Alcala, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7316-0441
Jānis ReblisIndependent Participant, Īdeņa, Latvia.
Ilga ZagorskaInstitute of Latvian History, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-7868-7998
Aimée LittleCentre for Artefacts and Materials Analysis, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4713-4260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal teeth were amongst the most common materials utilised for personal ornament production during the Stone Age, especially in the Northern Hemisphere. The hunter-gatherer cemetery site of Zvejnieki (Latvia) (7500-2500 cal. BC) is a clear example of this, with more than 2000 animal teeth excavated from grave contexts. Animal tooth pendants from the site have received significant scholarly attention, largely focusing on their faunal identification, type of use, placement within graves, as well as aspects of their production. Considerably less attention, however, has been given to the process of extracting teeth and the corresponding physical traces this might leave behind. This is true for Zvejnieki, but also for teeth extraction for the purposes of personal ornamentation across early prehistory more generally. To address this gap, we have employed experimental archaeological methods to critically evaluate possible Stone Age techniques of tooth extraction from key ungulate species, assessing the diagnostic traces created on the tooth itself and on the skull or mandible. The results suggest that several different methods of tooth extraction are viable, but cooking animals using boiling or a pit method is highly efficient. These methods lead to high extraction rates with no tooth damage, while also rendering the meat from the skull edible and the bones usable for other applications, such as tool production. Our research provides insights into the relationships between different spheres of hunter-gatherer life and death at Zvejnieki, specifically the acquisition of game animals, their treatment, and how this interacts with the extraction and processing of materials for craftwork and food preparation. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-025-02260-0.

Indexed as

Animal teethChaîne opératoireExperimental archaeologyHunter-gatherersPersonal ornamentsStone Age

Identifiers

PMID40547566
PMCPMC12181117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.