ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025
Development and validation of a contraceptive dispensing protocol for community pharmacists in Qatar: a Delphi study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hormonal contraceptives are available over the counter in community pharmacies in Qatar, placing significant responsibility on community pharmacists (CPs) to ensure safe use. The current study aimed to develop and validate a contraceptive dispensing protocol for CPs use in Qatar. Methods: A scoping review identified suitable protocols, with an initial protocol adapted from The United States Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Validation occurred through a three-round online Delphi technique: one qualitative round and two quantitative rounds. A panel of ten licensed obstetricians and gynecologists in Qatar participated. Qualitative data were thematically analysed, and consensus in quantitative rounds was defined as over 80% participant agreement. Results: Two major themes emerged: (1) challenges in assessing the appropriateness of items related to protected intercourse, recent childbirth, and cultural sensitivity around sexually transmitted disease-related questions, and (2) positive feedback on screening and simplification recommendations. In the first round, the protocol comprised 31 items. In the second round, 25 of these items reached consensus. Five items that received 70% to 80% agreement were carried forward to a third round, along with one newly added item. Of the six items assessed in the third round, consensus was achieved for five. Consequently, the final protocol consisted of 29 items. Conclusion: A 29-item protocol was developed and validated to assess women's eligibility for contraceptive use by CPs in Qatar. Future research should target translating the protocol into other languages and conducting cultural adaptation studies. It should also explore the development and testing of a collaborative intervention involving pharmacists and other healthcare providers to deliver comprehensive, multidisciplinary contraceptive services to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.