Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547560›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Sedation in endoscopy: Current practices and future innovations.

Angelo Bruni, Giovanni Barbara, Alessandro Vitello, Giovanni Marasco, Marcello Maida

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angelo BruniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Giovanni BarbaraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Alessandro VitelloDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna 'Kore', Enna 94100, Sicilia, Italy.
Giovanni MarascoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Marcello MaidaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna 'Kore', Enna 94100, Sicilia, Italy. marcello.maida@unikore.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedation practices in gastrointestinal endoscopy have evolved considerably, driven by patient demand for comfort and the need to minimize cardiopulmonary complications. Recent guidelines emphasize personalized sedation strategies, risk assessment, and vigilant hemodynamic monitoring to ensure that sedation depth aligns with each patient's comorbidities and procedural requirements. Within this landscape, the trial by Luo

Indexed as

Endoscopy sedationEtomidateGastrointestinal endoscopyPropofolRemimazolamSedation monitoringTarget-controlled infusion

Identifiers

PMID40547560
PMCPMC12179949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.