ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Modern endoscopist's toolbox: Innovations in foreign body removal.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Management of Jejunal Perforation Caused by Toothpick Ingestion: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Spontaneous passage of an accidentally ingested metallic bullet casing in an adolescent: a case report.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Removal of gastrointestinal foreign body.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body ingestion is a common gastrointestinal emergency, particularly in children, who account for 80% of cases. While most ingested objects pass spontaneously, around 20% require medical intervention. In adults, incidents often occur accidentally during meals, leading to impactions, especially in individuals with underlying esophageal conditions. Endoscopy remains the gold standard for foreign body retrieval, with a success rate exceeding 95%. The type, shape, and location of the foreign body determine the clinical presentation and management approach. Sharp objects, batteries, and large items pose the highest risk of complications, including perforation, obstruction, and chemical injury. Prompt endoscopic removal is guided by established protocols, with emergent intervention required for complete esophageal obstruction and high-risk objects. Various retrieval devices, including forceps, snares, baskets, and overtubes, are used based on the nature of the foreign body. Technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence-assisted imaging and endoscopic ultrasound, are improving diagnostic precision and procedural outcomes. Despite these advances, foreign body ingestion can still lead to severe complications if not managed in a timely manner. Public awareness, preventive measures, and rapid medical response are essential in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with foreign body ingestion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.