ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Intravenous proton pump inhibitors
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers as a New Frontier in Acid-Related Disorders and the Role of South Korean Pharmacological Innovation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy of tegoprazan in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review on the current management of upper-GI bleed.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Pharmacological Management of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Management of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with the intent of reducing gastric acidity to the desired therapeutic level for treating bleeding peptic ulcer still has several limitations.
aimTo compare intravenous PPIs and oral potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs) administered prior to endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.
methodsThis retrospective study involved 105 consecutive patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (treated August 2023 to February 2024). Prior to emergency endoscopy, patients received either intravenous PPI (pantoprazole 80 mg bolus) or oral PCAB (tegoprazan 50 mg single-dose). Severity of bleeding was assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall, and AIMS65 scoring systems. Patients with severe comorbidities were excluded. Primary outcomes included need for therapeutic endoscopic intervention and occurrence of re-bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.
resultsTotal of the 105 patients, 61 received intravenous PPI injection and 44 received oral PCAB prior to emergency endoscopy. To minimize selection bias, bleeding severity was assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores, with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups. During emergency endoscopy performed within 48 hours, ulcer bed status was classified according to the Forrest classification. The proportion of lesions graded IIa or higher was significantly lower in the PCAB group (
conclusionPre-endoscopic PCAB administration is more effective than PPI injection for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and may reduce ulcer bleeding mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.