Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547421›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2025

Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the future role of robotic aortic valve replacement.

Vikrant Jagadeesan, J Hunter Mehaffey, Ali Darehzereshki, Ramesh Daggubati, Goya Raikar, Lawrence Wei, Vinay Badhwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vikrant JagadeesanDepartment of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
J Hunter MehaffeyDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ali DarehzereshkiDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ramesh DaggubatiDepartment of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Goya RaikarDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Lawrence WeiDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Vinay BadhwarDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients desire a minimally invasive option for management of their valve disease. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains a straightforward short-term solution, it is incumbent upon surgeons to provide an alternative, and preferably non-sternotomy or anterior chest option with the longitudinal benefits of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The present review will focus on the novel use of robotic aortic valve replacement (RAVR) via right lateral transaxillary mini-thoracotomy to perform standard SAVR, which permits the additional ability to perform concomitant procedures using the standard lateral approach popularized in mitral and atrial fibrillation surgery. We will define a role for RAVR in the current landscape of TAVR to provide a minimally invasive and durable operation, allowing for performance of concomitant procedures. Furthermore, we will focus on current literature supporting the safe and stepwise expansion of RAVR worldwide to provide patients requiring aortic valve replacement another option.

Indexed as

Robotic aortic valve replacement (RAVR)surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Identifiers

PMID40547421
PMCPMC12177767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.