Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40547385›Full record

ArticleMedical acupuncture2025

Fascial Nodal Point

Joseph F Audette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical acupuncture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joseph F AudetteHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acupuncture clinical research has gone through a stage of exponential growth since the NIH consensus statement published in 1998 with over 21,000 articles indexed in PubMed. However, there is still uncertainty about the scientific or biological basis of an acupuncture point. This adversely affects research making it impossible to defend what is a real or verum acupuncture point versus a sham or non-acupuncture point that could be used in a randomized controlled study as a control group. Even more problematic is related lack of certainty about the anatomic target of the inserted needle. Discussion: The scientific community has proposed a number of possible tissue targets based on the physiological response to acupuncture stimulation from motor end points in the muscle to nerve plexuses and trunks to the fascia. Complicating this discussion is the fact that within acupuncture traditions across the world, there are many different needling styles from Japanese approaches that tend to be more superficial, to deep needle stimulation styles from China, to cutaneous needling methods developed in Germany called the Very Point technique. A subset of this debate revolves around the use of acupuncture needles to treat myofascial trigger points. Conclusion: This article will discuss some of the leading theories especially as they relate to acupuncture and propose a model that focuses on fascial stimulation. An acupuncture needle technique called Fascial Nodal Point

Indexed as

acupointdry needlingfasciamyofascialneedle techniquetensegrity

Identifiers

PMID40547385
PMCPMC12179377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.