ArticleOpen respiratory archives
Effectiveness of a Structured Self-Management Intervention to Improve Quality of Life in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AMPOC Study).
Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Knowledge and attitudes about social determinants of respiratory health in SEPAR members].Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a structured self-management program in patients with moderate-severe COPD followed up for 12 months, in improving quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, anxiety, and depression, compared to standard practice. Material and methods: This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial involving 115 patients, 59 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group. Participants from 16 primary care centers in Barcelona, Spain, were allocated consecutively and in a blinded manner to the intervention and control groups in stages. Professionals received training in behavioral change techniques. The intervention consisted of four 20-min sessions conducted at 14-day intervals, covering topics such as COPD knowledge, smoking, inhaler use, physical activity, nutrition, breathing, exacerbations, vaccinations, work and environmental conditions, leisure, sexuality, daily activities, anxiety, and depression. Results: A total of 102 patients completed the study, 50 in the intervention group and 52 in the control group. Differences between the intervention and control groups in quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, smoking, anxiety, and depression were not significant. Conclusion: In patients with moderate-severe COPD, a structured self-management intervention in primary care is not more effective than standard care in improving quality of life, dyspnea, inhaler adherence, anxiety, and depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.