ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Risk Prediction of Cerebrovascular Ischemic Events Following Cervical Artery Dissections Using High-Intensity Transient Signals: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and a single center experience.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Microembolic signals in transcranial Doppler and the functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in geriatric anesthesia: moving toward personalized brain protection strategies.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Predicting and managing spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissections (CeAD) is challenging due to the absence of tools for early identification of high-risk individuals. This study seeks to gather evidence on the predictive value of high-intensity transient signals (HITS) detected by Transcranial Doppler for recurrent ischemic events (IEs) following CeAD. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies along with the data from our cohort. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Pubmed, Embase and Scopus to identify studies that evaluated HITS in patients with CeAD with the aim of predicting IEs. Data were pooled using a random effects model, with odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) as the effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q statistic and I Results: Our systematic review included five prior studies, which, combined with our center's sample size, provided data for a total of 306 patients. The meta-analysis indicated that HITS is a significant predictor of IEs (OR: 13.25, 95% CI [2.97-59.13], Conclusions: The presence of HITS detected by TCD is a strong predictor of IEs in patients with Carotid artery dissections. This highlights the clinical value of TCD in identifying high-risk patients and emphasizes the need for proactive management strategies to reduce the risk of future IEs in this subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.