ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Artificial intelligence in medical imaging diagnosis: are we ready for its clinical implementation?
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which explainable AI methods in medical imaging are clinically impactful? A systematic literature review addressing the clinician's perspective.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Non-invasive imaging diagnostic techniques in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a roadmap for clinicians.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2026Review
- Non-invasive anemia detection from conjunctiva and sclera images using vision transformer with attention map explainability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We examine the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging diagnosis, focusing on improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency through advanced algorithms. It addresses the significant challenges preventing immediate clinical adoption of AI, specifically from technical, ethical, and legal perspectives. The aim is to highlight the current state of AI in medical imaging and outline the necessary steps to ensure safe, effective, and ethically sound clinical implementation. Approach: We conduct a comprehensive discussion, with special emphasis on the technical requirements for robust AI models, the ethical frameworks needed for responsible deployment, and the legal implications, including data privacy and regulatory compliance. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is examined as a means to increase transparency and build trust among healthcare professionals and patients. Results: The analysis reveals key challenges to AI integration in clinical settings, including the need for extensive high-quality datasets, model reliability, advanced infrastructure, and compliance with regulatory standards. The lack of explainability in AI outputs remains a barrier, with XAI identified as crucial for meeting transparency standards and enhancing trust among end users. Conclusions: Overcoming these barriers requires a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to integrate AI into clinical practice responsibly. Addressing technical, ethical, and legal issues will support a softer transition, fostering a more accurate, efficient, and patient-centered healthcare system where AI augments traditional medical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.